Toxicology Research - Forensic Toxicology, Carcinogenicity, Assays

Toxicology Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Toxicology, including details on forensic toxicology, carcinogenicity, assays.


Toxicology Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Toxicology

Books on Toxicology

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Mitochondrial DNA analysis of acellular laboratory samples.

Snowdon V, Hay RW, Demetrick DJ

Biomedicaltechnology Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

The source of acellular specimens is not infrequently challenged, especially for toxicology specimens, but such specimens may not be amenable to conventional genetic testing to confirm the source. Our evaluation of genomic and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) amplicons using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from centrifuged, filtered, or whole urine specimens demonstrated higher sensitivity of detection of mtDNA than genomic DNA and a higher detection rate for the mtDNA markers than genomic markers in all sample sets. The mitochondrial amplicons were sequenced to identify specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Subsequently, a real-time PCR technique using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) probes designed to hybridize to the published mtDNA sequence over known SNP locations present within the mitochondrial control region was developed. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using a FRET-based assay of mitochondrial genotypes with acellular laboratory specimens to screen for specimen mix-ups or to confirm sources of controversial toxicology specimens.

Published 20 June 2007 in Am J Clin Pathol, 128(1): 92-9.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2009 Toxicology Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Toxicology Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (August)
  Issue 2 (September)
  Issue 3 (October)
  Issue 4 (November)
  Issue 5 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2009)
  Issue 1 (January)



Toxicology Books

Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective

Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective